Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M51 is a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ, having a global score of 87.7 against 82.7. These phones have the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. Although Galaxy M51 is newer than LG G8X ThinQ, it is just a bit heavier and thicker.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little better processing power than Galaxy M51. Both have 6 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor. The LG G8X ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy M51, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a quite greater display pixels density.
The Galaxy M51 shoots much better photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a much more MP back facing camera and a much bigger sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and videos.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy M51, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much better battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.