Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Aurora black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 is slightly better than LG G8X ThinQ, having a 90.8 score against 82.7. Galaxy Note 20's construction has the same thickness than the LG G8X ThinQ, but it is a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit superior CPU than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has a greater amount of RAM.
LG G8X ThinQ features a little bit better display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. The Galaxy Note 20 features a little bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a 12 megapixels camera and a same size aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a much better video quality and a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
LG G8X ThinQ features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 20, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy Note 20 features just a bit better battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has an 8% greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG G8X ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note 20, else you can save some dollars and get the LG G8X ThinQ, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.