Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting a global score of 82.7 against 80.4. The LG G8X ThinQ construction is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's, although it is somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit more vivid display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM memory. LG G8X ThinQ features a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and a 12 megapixels camera in the back, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
LG G8X ThinQ features a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG G8X ThinQ counts with superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, LG G8X ThinQ is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.