Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Aurora black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ's global score of 82.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 body is somewhat lighter and a little bit thinner than LG G8X ThinQ, even though both of them were released only 2 months apart. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a processing unit that is very similar to LG G8X ThinQ's processor, and although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
LG G8X ThinQ has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a little bigger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a just a little higher pixel density. The LG G8X ThinQ features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG G8X ThinQ has just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Galaxy Note10 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same sensor size, a back camera with a 12 MP and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger diafragm aperture.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G8X ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Note10, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG G8X ThinQ, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.