Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note3's overall score of 77.7. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the LG G8X ThinQ has older 10 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2. The LG G8X ThinQ is a somewhat heavier phone than Galaxy Note3, but they are equally thin.
LG G8X ThinQ has just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. LG G8X ThinQ has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px, a bit bigger display and a just a bit better pixels density.
The LG G8X ThinQ captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a camera in the back with lesser megapixels and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor and a bigger aperture. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.