Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora black | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 overall score. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version and LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version. Galaxy S10's body is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the LG G8X ThinQ, even when both of them were released only 8 months apart.
The Galaxy S10 has a bit sharper screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S10 and LG G8X ThinQ count with really similar processing units, and although the Galaxy S10 has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S10 also has a larger diafragm aperture for better photography and videos in low-light situations.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is more expensive than LG G8X ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.