Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-11-01 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Aurora black | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G is much better than LG G8X ThinQ, with a global score of 93.6 against 82.7. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S10 5G has 11 version and LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10. The Galaxy S10 5G construction is a bit heavier but just a bit thinner than the LG G8X ThinQ, and they were only released with a couple of months difference.
Galaxy S10 5G's CPU is very similar to the CPU in LG G8X ThinQ, and although the Galaxy S10 5G has a larger amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a little sharper screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a quite bigger display, a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a little bit higher pixel count in each inch in the display.
The Galaxy S10 5G counts with a slightly better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, a 0.39 inches sensor, a same resolution camera and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy S10 5G also has a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features just a bit better battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy S10 5G is way more expensive than the LG G8X ThinQ, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.