Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Aurora black | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a global score of 89.7, which is a little bit better than LG G8X ThinQ's 82.7 global score. Even though Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite and LG G8X ThinQ were only released with a few months difference, Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a bit lighter and just a bit thinner. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little smaller display and a little lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a better storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same internal memory, the LG G8X ThinQ also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's processing unit is very similar to LG G8X ThinQ's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has more RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a little better battery life than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a superior camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a much bigger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality and a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy S10 Lite costs more than LG G8X ThinQ, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.