Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aurora black | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has an overall score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 global score. LG G8X ThinQ's construction is much newer and thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, although it is just a bit heavier. LG G8X ThinQ has just a little better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4 more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Galaxy S7 Active has a more vivid screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The LG G8X ThinQ takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and a back camera with a 12 MP resolution, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates.
LG G8X ThinQ has a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage. The LG G8X ThinQ and the Galaxy S7 Active have incredibly similar batteries duration.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG G8X ThinQ is also cheaper than the Galaxy S7 Active.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.