Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2017-08-11 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Aurora black | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy S8 Active's 81.9 score. LG G8X ThinQ's body is way newer, a bit lighter and thinner than Galaxy S8 Active. The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a little more vivid screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960px resolution and a greater count of pixels per inch of display.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The LG G8X ThinQ shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same (4K) video resolution and a 0.39 inches sensor, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with faster video frame rates.
The Galaxy S8 Active counts with a battery performance that's very similar to the battery duration in LG G8X ThinQ.
LG G8X ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the Galaxy S8 Active.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.