Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 82.7 score against 80.1. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. LG G8X ThinQ is a way lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when they were only released 5 months apart.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little sharper display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
LG G8X ThinQ takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, and they both have a 12 mega pixels back facing camera and a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
LG G8X ThinQ features a lot bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has more internal memory and a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.