Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro, with an 82.7 score against 81. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11. Although LG G8X ThinQ and the Galaxy XCover Pro were released with only a few months difference, LG G8X ThinQ is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM. LG G8X ThinQ features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340px resolution, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a little larger screen.
The LG G8X ThinQ features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features just a little better battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 1 percent larger battery size.
LG G8X ThinQ shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way worse 12 MP resolution camera in the back and a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The LG G8X ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.