Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than the LG G8X ThinQ, with an 88.5 score against 82.7. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version. Galaxy Z Flip is a just a bit lighter and thinner phone than LG G8X ThinQ, even though both were only released 4 months apart.
The Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better looking display than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2636 resolution, a little higher pixels amount per inch in the display and a bit larger screen. LG G8X ThinQ features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip captures a little bit better photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ. They have a 0.39 inches back camera sensor, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and a same resolution camera in the back.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G8X ThinQ. If you want to save some money, you can buy LG G8X ThinQ, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.