Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is much better than the LG G8X ThinQ, with a 92.3 score against 82.7. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a newer 11 version and LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is newer, somewhat thinner and just a bit lighter than LG G8X ThinQ.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a bit better looking display than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a bit larger display, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a just a little more pixels per inch of display. The LG G8X ThinQ has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a little faster processing unit than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ. Both have a 12 mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, the same video frame rates, a 0.39 inches sensor, the same diafragm aperture and the same video resolution.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the LG G8X ThinQ. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy LG G8X ThinQ, and give up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.