Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-11-01 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Aurora black | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.12 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 3 is just a bit better than the LG G8X ThinQ, with a 90.6 score against 82.7. Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a newer and a lot thinner cellphone than LG G8X ThinQ, although it is also incredibly heavier. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a more recent 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 has a bit better processor than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ has a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little higher screen pixel density.
LG G8X ThinQ has a greater camera than Galaxy Z Fold 3, and although they both have a 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a bigger camera aperture. LG G8X ThinQ has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 counts with just a little better battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.