Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-11-01 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 222.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.06 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a score of 91.1, which is better than LG G8X ThinQ's general score of 82.7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition body is incredibly thinner but somewhat heavier than the LG G8X ThinQ. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has the newer 14 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a much better looking screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1968 x 2184 and a larger display. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has just a bit better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a bit superior battery duration than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 10 percent greater battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG G8X ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG G8X ThinQ. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the LG G8X ThinQ, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.