Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-11-01 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is a bit better than Xperia XZ2 Compact's general score of 79. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but LG G8X ThinQ has 10 version and Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though LG G8X ThinQ is somewhat heavier than the Xperia XZ2 Compact, it's way thinner and also newer.
The Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact features a better display than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
Xperia XZ2 Compact features a slightly better camera than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a larger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The LG G8X ThinQ features a really longer battery lifetime than Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 39% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.