Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 82.7 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Sony |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-11-01 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Aurora black | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 222.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a general score of 82.7, which is a little bit better than Xperia XZs's score of 77.2. The LG G8X ThinQ construction is noticeably newer, but somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker than the Xperia XZs. LG G8X ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of faster cores.
LG G8X ThinQ counts with a slightly better display than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has a just a bit lower display pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a larger screen. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a superior battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2900mAh. Xperia XZs captures much better photos and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xperia XZs also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back-facing camera with a lot better 19 MP resolution and faster 960 frames per second video frame rate.
The LG G8X ThinQ is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.