Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 28.8 | 31.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| 2009-02-16 | 2005-11-08 |
| 4.06 x 1.77 x 0.54 inches | 3.90 x 2.10 x 0.60 inches |
| 2.47 ounces | 3.49 ounces |
| $ 100.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.5 inches | -- |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 176 x 220 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 121 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 0.4 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| GSM | CDMA |
| SIM | -- |
| 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 800mAh Li-Ion Battery | 740mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 400 hours standby time 6.3 hours talk time | 215 hours standby time 3.3 hours talk time |
| 2.24 | 2.16 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth 1.1 |
| -- | GPS |
Comparison review
The Motorola RAZR V3c has a global score of 31.2, which is a little bit better than the LG GB102's 28.8 overall score. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, we must note that it's also way older, way heavier and a little bit thicker. The Motorola RAZR V3c's CPU is very similar to the processor in LG GB102, both have the same number of cores.
The LG GB102 has a lot better display than Motorola RAZR V3c, although it has a lot lower 128 x 128px resolution. Motorola RAZR V3c counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than LG GB102. Motorola RAZR V3c shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG GB102. LG GB102 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Motorola RAZR V3c, because it has an 8 percent more battery capacity.
Motorola RAZR V3c not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the LG GB102, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.