Compare phones
Motorola Q GSM
Q8 GSM| Global Score | |
| 29.3 | 31.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| -- | Windows Mobile Standard 5.0 |
| -- | 2005-07-26 |
| 4.06 x 1.81 x 0.49 inches | 4.57 x 2.48 x 0.45 inches |
| 2.38 ounces | 4.06 ounces |
| $ 240.00 | $ 165.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.5 inches | -- |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 121 pixels per inch | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.4 | 3 |
| processor | processor |
| -- | 64 MB RAM |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| Storage | |
| 2,05 MB internal memory | -- |
| No SD card slot | miniSD external memory slot |
| 0.1 | 0 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 1.30 MP |
| 0 | 4.51 |
| GPRS and GSM | EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 950mAh Li-Ion Battery | Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 240 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.48 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| -- | Bluetooth |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Q GSM has a global score of 31.6, which is just a bit better than LG GB160A's 29.3 overall score. The Motorola Q GSM is a just a little thinner but way heavier phone than the LG GB160A. The LG GB160A has a much better looking screen than Motorola Q GSM, although it has a way worse resolution of 128 x 128px.
LG GB160A features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Q GSM, although it has no slot for SD memory cards. Motorola Q GSM and LG GB160A feature incredibly similar CPUs, both of them have 0 cores. The Motorola Q GSM shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG GB160A.
The LG GB160A features a much better battery duration than Motorola Q GSM.
Motorola Q GSM not only is the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.