Search


Compare phones

Global Score
29.332
Basic Information
LGNokia
--2009-05-18
4.06 x 1.81 x 0.49 inches3.66 x 1.81 x 0.70 inches
2.38 ounces3.19 ounces
--Black and Red
$ 240.00$ 195.00
Display / Screen
1.5 inches1.8 inches
128 x 128 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
TFTTFT
121 pixels per inch114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.45.3
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
2,05 MB internal memory9,22 MB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
0.10.2
Camera
--1.30 MP
04.51
GPRS and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.20.3
Battery Life
950mAh Li-Ion Battery860mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
432 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.482.32
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.0
FM RadioFM Radio

Comparison review

Nokia 2720 fold has a general score of 32, which is a little bit better than the LG GB160A's overall score of 29.3. The Nokia 2720 fold is a heavier and extremely thicker cellphone than the LG GB160A. The LG GB160A features a bit more vivid display than Nokia 2720 fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 128 x 128 pixels, it also counts with a little more pixels per screen inch.

LG GB160A and Nokia 2720 fold have incredibly similar processing units, both have the same number of cores. Nokia 2720 fold counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than LG GB160A, because it has 9,22 MB internal memory capacity. Nokia 2720 fold shoots greater videos and photos than LG GB160A.

LG GB160A has just a little better battery lifetime than Nokia 2720 fold, because it has 950mAh of battery capacity.

Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Nokia 2720 fold is also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.