Search


Compare phones

Global Score
29.331.6
Basic Information
LGNokia
--2010-06-03
4.06 x 1.81 x 0.49 inches4.25 x 1.77 x 0.57 inches
2.38 ounces2.61 ounces
--Black, Blue and White
$ 240.00$ 139.00
Display / Screen
1.5 inches1.8 inches
128 x 128 pixels 128 x 160 pixels
TFTTFT
121 pixels per inch114 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.45.3
processor processor
--16 MB RAM
GPU GPU
5.765.67
Storage
2,05 MB internal memory10,24 MB internal memory
No SD card slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
0.11.52
Camera
--0.30 MP
--128 x 96 (10 fps) video resolution
03.74
GPRS and GSMGPRS and GSM
SIMSIM, Dual SIM
0.20.2
Battery Life
950mAh Li-Ion Battery1020mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
240 hours standby time
6 hours talk time
396 hours standby time
4 hours talk time
2.482.64
Other Features
--Bluetooth 2.1, EDR
FM Radio--

Comparison review

Nokia C2-00 is a little bit better than LG GB160A, with a score of 31.6 against 29.3. Even being the best device we compare here, the Nokia C2-00 design is a little bit heavier and thicker than LG GB160A. LG GB160A has a bit better performance than Nokia C2-00. Both of them have 0 processing cores.

LG GB160A features a bit sharper display than Nokia C2-00, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little lower 128 x 128 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little better screen pixel density. The Nokia C2-00 has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than LG GB160A, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 32 GB and 10,24 MB internal memory capacity.

Nokia C2-00 shoots much clearer videos and photos than LG GB160A. Nokia C2-00 features just a bit longer battery performance than LG GB160A, because it has a 1020mAh battery capacity against 950mAh.

Nokia C2-00 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.