Search


Compare phones

Samsung Chrono

SCH-R260, SCH-R261, SCH-R261A
Global Score
32.936.1
Basic Information
LGSamsung
2010-06-020000-00-00
3.60 x 1.90 x 0.70 inches3.70 x 1.83 x 0.67 inches
2.80 ounces3.14 ounces
--Scratch-Resistant Glass
$ 300.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
--2 inches
--240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
--TFT
167 pixels per inch200 pixels per inch
No touch screenNo touch screen
5.66.3
processor processor
GPUARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU
5.765.94
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
Camera
0.30 MP0.30 MP
3.633.63
EDGE and GSMCDMA
SIM--
0.30.1
Battery Life
900mAh Li-Ion Battery800mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
552 hours standby time
7.5 hours talk time
526 hours standby time
5 hours talk time
2.42.24
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 2.1, EDR
--GPS

Comparison review

The Samsung Chrono is slightly better than the LG GS170, having a 36.1 score against 32.9. Samsung Chrono's body is somewhat heavier but a bit thinner than the LG GS170. The Samsung Chrono counts with a brighter screen than LG GS170, because it has a little bit greater screen pixels density. The Samsung Chrono counts with a little better processing power than LG GS170, and although they both have 0 processing cores, the Samsung Chrono also has an additional graphics co-processor.

The Samsung Chrono features as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as LG GS170. The LG GS170 has a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Chrono, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity. Samsung Chrono features a camera that is just as good as LG GS170's camera, they have a back-facing camera with a 0.3 megapixels resolution.

Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Chrono is also a lot cheaper.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.