Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66.3 | 64.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Nokia |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-20 | 2019-06-10 |
| 6.13 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Blue, Red and Titan | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 90.00 | $ 90.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 QM215 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 8.19 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG K22 is just a bit better than Nokia 3.1 A, getting a 66.3 score against 64.8. The LG K22 is a newer and somewhat thinner phone than the Nokia 3.1 A, although it is also a little heavier. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but LG K22 has older 10 version and Nokia 3.1 A has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a bit sharper screen than LG K22, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse 720 x 1440 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel number in each inch in the display. Nokia 3.1 A features a bit more powerful CPU than LG K22. They have 2 GB of RAM memory and 4 cores.
Nokia 3.1 A features more storage to install applications and games than LG K22, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Nokia 3.1 A also has an external SD slot that admits up to 128 GB. Nokia 3.1 A's battery duration is just as good as LG K22's battery life, although the Nokia 3.1 A has just 2990mAh battery capacity.
LG K22 shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Nokia 3.1 A, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for taking images or video in low light situations, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the LG K22 also counts with a lot better 13 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
The LG K22 costs the same than Nokia 3.1 A.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.