Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-08-21 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.82 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.15 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Silver | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 295 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is much better than LG K31, having a global score of 80 against 69. The Google Pixel 3 design is a little bit thinner than LG K31, but it's a little bit heavier and was released about 22 months before. The Google Pixel 3 has a much better display than LG K31, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher quantity of pixels per inch of display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2160px.
The Google Pixel 3 has a little better hardware performance than LG K31, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 3 has a bit better camera than LG K31, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lower 12.2 mega pixels resolution, and they both have the same aperture, the Google Pixel 3 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Google Pixel 3 counts with slightly more storage for games and applications than LG K31, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory capacity. The LG K31 has a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 2915mAh.
Google Pixel 3 is a bit more expensive than the LG K31, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.