Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2019-03-20 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.02 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 450 SDM450 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.36 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A6 has an overall score of 75.8, which is just a bit better than the LG K40's 69.8 score. Even though Galaxy A6 is older and somewhat heavier than LG K40, it's design is still just a bit thinner. LG K40 and Samsung Galaxy A6 both feature extremely similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A6 has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels quantity in each display inch and a bit higher resolution of 720 x 1480 pixels.
LG K40 counts with a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. LG K40 has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy A6 captures better photos and videos than LG K40, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A6 also has a back facing camera with a lot better 16 megapixels resolution, a bigger camera sensor shooting higher quality photos and videos and a larger aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited environments.
Galaxy A6 features a battery life that's just as good as LG K40's battery duration.
The Galaxy A6 not only is the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheaper than the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.