Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Apple |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has an overall score of 88.1, which is way better than the LG K50's score of 72.2. IPhone X's construction is somewhat thinner than LG K50, but it's a bit heavier and was released just a little more than a year before. IPhone X has a much more vibrant screen than LG K50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better screen pixel density and a much higher 1125 x 2436 resolution.
IPhone X has just a bit more storage for apps and games than LG K50, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Apple iPhone X has a faster processing unit than LG K50, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores (but faster), and they both have 3 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64 bits processing unit.
LG K50 has greater battery life than iPhone X, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity. Apple iPhone X captures a little bit better photographs and videos than LG K50, because although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels, and they both have the same camera sensor size, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.