Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 is better than the LG K50, getting a general score of 80 against 72.2. Google Pixel 3's body is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than LG K50, even though it was released around 10 months before. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a much better display than LG K50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2160px and a way better amount of pixels per inch of screen.
The LG K50 has a very superior storage for applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Google Pixel 3 counts with just a little better hardware performance than LG K50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG K50 counts with greater battery duration than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 3500mAh battery size. Google Pixel 3 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than LG K50, because although it has a camera with much less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos, a larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.