Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 XL is better than LG K50, having an 80.7 score against 72.2. Google Pixel 3 XL's design is a little bit thinner than the LG K50, but it is a bit heavier and was released only 10 months before. The Google Pixel 3 XL features a way better looking screen than LG K50, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a lot more pixels per display inch and a lot higher 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution.
LG K50 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better performance than LG K50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 3 XL also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL has a slightly better camera than LG K50, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega-pixels, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality, a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality photographs and videos and a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations.
The LG K50 and the Google Pixel 3 XL feature very similar batteries duration, although the Google Pixel 3 XL has just 3430mAh of battery size instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.