Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is just a bit better than the LG K50, having a 78.8 score against 72.2. Both devices we are comparing here use Android OS (operating system), but the Google Pixel 3a has the previous 11 version and LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie. Google Pixel 3a is a lighter and a bit thinner phone than the LG K50, even when they were released only 4 months apart.
The Google Pixel 3a counts with a sharper screen than LG K50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2220px resolution and much more pixels per display inch. Google Pixel 3a's CPU is just as good as the LG K50 one, and although the Google Pixel 3a has a higher amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
The LG K50 counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG K50 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 17% greater battery size.
The Google Pixel 3a has just a bit better camera than LG K50, because although it has a back camera with a much worse 12.2 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light captures and a larger sensor which offers a higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.