Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 has a general score of 81.9, which is better than the LG K50's general score of 72.2. Even though the Google Pixel 4 and the LG K50 were only released with a few months difference, the Google Pixel 4 is just a little thinner and a little lighter. Google Pixel 4 has a little bit better hardware performance than LG K50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4 also has 3 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 features a much better display than LG K50, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way higher 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a lot better pixel density. The LG K50 counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K50 counts with longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 25% more battery size. Google Pixel 4 has a bit better camera than LG K50, because although it has a camera in the back with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture to capture better photos in low light situations, a lot better video resolution and a larger sensor capturing better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.