Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has an overall score of 82.9, which is better than the LG K50's general score of 72.2. The Google Pixel 4a design is newer, somewhat lighter and a little thinner than LG K50. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a has the older 11 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Google Pixel 4a counts with a brighter display than LG K50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a much higher display pixel density. Google Pixel 4a has a little better hardware performance than LG K50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Google Pixel 4a also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
Google Pixel 4a captures clearer photos and videos than LG K50, because although it has a lot worse 12.2 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a much bigger diafragm aperture and a bigger sensor. The LG K50 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The LG K50 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.