Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a general score of 87.5, which is a lot better than LG K50's general score of 72.2. The Google Pixel 4a 5G design is newer, just a bit lighter and just a little bit thinner than the LG K50. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 4a 5G has the previous 11 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a brighter display than LG K50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with way more pixels per display inch and a much better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features a bit faster processing unit than LG K50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than LG K50, because although it has a back camera with way less MP resolution, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a lot higher (4K) video definition and a bigger sensor. LG K50 has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with just a bit better battery duration than LG K50, because it has an 11 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.