Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.44 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 has a score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than LG K50's score of 72.2. Even though the HTC One M9 is incredibly older and thicker than LG K50, it's body is still a little bit lighter. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version and LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The HTC One M9 has just a bit better processing power than LG K50, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also has a 64 bits processing unit and an extra graphics processor. HTC One M9 counts with a way better looking screen than LG K50, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a lot better amount of pixels per inch of display.
LG K50 features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG K50 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG K50 features superior battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 23 percent more battery size.
The HTC One M9 features a little bit better camera than LG K50, and although they both have a F2.2 aperture, the HTC One M9 also has a way higher 3840x2160 video definition, a way bigger camera sensor and a camera with more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.