Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | HTC |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 267 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 has a score of 77.6, which is a little bit better than LG K50's score of 72.2. The HTC U11 body is a little lighter and just a little bit thinner than LG K50, although it was released 2 years before. The HTC U11 features a much sharper screen than LG K50, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution and way more pixels per inch of display.
LG K50 has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC U11, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. HTC U11 features a bit better CPU than LG K50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the HTC U11 also has 1 GB more RAM memory.
HTC U11 counts with a slightly better camera than LG K50, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video.
LG K50 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.