Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG G8X ThinQ is better than LG K50, with a global score of 82.7 against 72.2. Even though LG G8X ThinQ and the LG K50 were only released 2 months apart, LG G8X ThinQ's construction is a bit thinner but also somewhat heavier. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but LG G8X ThinQ has an older 10 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a little better performance than LG K50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a brighter display than LG K50, because it has a bit bigger screen, a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and much more pixels per inch of screen.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games than LG K50, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB, the LG G8X ThinQ also has more internal storage. The LG G8X ThinQ shoots a little bit better pictures and videos than LG K50, because although it has a lot lower resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture and a much higher video definition.
The LG G8X ThinQ has a bit better battery performance than LG K50, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.