Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-08-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has an overall score of 82.5, which is much better than LG K50's global score of 72.2. The LG V30S ThinQ construction is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than LG K50, although it was released around 18 months before. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has older 8.0 Oreo version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a little faster processor than LG K50, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V30S ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM. LG V30S ThinQ has a much more vibrant screen than LG K50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with much more pixels per inch of display and a way higher 1440 x 2880px resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ shoots a bit better photographs and videos than LG K50, because although it has a tinier sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have a camera with a 16 mega-pixels resolution, the LG V30S ThinQ also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a much bigger aperture to take better photography and video in low light situations.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a superior storage capacity for applications and games than LG K50, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has 96 GB more internal storage. The LG K50 features just a bit better battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.