Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | LG |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V35 ThinQ has an overall score of 81.3, which is better than the LG K50's 72.2 score. Although the LG V35 ThinQ is older than the LG K50, it's construction is thinner and just a little bit lighter. The LG V35 ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than LG K50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant screen than LG K50, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution and a lot better pixels quantity per screen inch. The LG V35 ThinQ has a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than LG K50, and although they both have an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 64 GB internal memory.
LG K50 counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 6% bigger battery size. LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better camera than LG K50, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting lower quality videos and images, and they both have a camera in the back with a 16 MP, the LG V35 ThinQ also counts with a much higher video definition and a way bigger aperture to capture better low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.