Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 85.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Microsoft |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2021-09-20 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Glacier and Obsidian |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2688 x 1892 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4449mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is better than LG K50, having a general score of 85.3 against 72.2. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has the previous 11 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 body is a lot newer and a lot thinner, but notably heavier than LG K50.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a little faster processing unit than LG K50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has 5 GB more RAM. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a lot better looking screen than LG K50, because it has a way higher 1892 x 2688 pixels resolution, a really larger screen and a higher pixel amount per inch in the screen.
LG K50 has a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features better battery duration than LG K50, because it has a 27% greater battery size.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 takes a little bit better photos and videos than LG K50, because although it has a way less mega-pixels camera in the back, it also counts with a way larger aperture to take better photos in low-light environments and a way higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.