Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is much better than the LG K50, with a score of 89.6 against 72.2. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, the Motorola edge design is a little thicker and just a little heavier than the LG K50. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but the Motorola edge has the older 10 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Motorola edge has a little better processing power than LG K50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola edge also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The Motorola edge has a more vivid display than LG K50, because it has a higher number of pixels per inch in the screen, a way better 1080 x 2340px resolution and a quite larger display.
The Motorola edge shoots greater photos and videos than LG K50, because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels, a lot larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution. The Motorola edge features a very superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than LG K50, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola edge counts with superior battery duration than LG K50, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.