Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play is a little bit better than LG K50, with a global score of 77.4 against 72.2. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play design is lighter and extremely thinner than the LG K50, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a bit better hardware performance than LG K50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z2 Play features a much better looking screen than LG K50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot better quantity of pixels per display inch. The Moto Z2 Play shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than LG K50, because although it has a way less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light situations and a lot better 3840x2160 video quality.
The Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a greater memory for apps and games than LG K50, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1,95 TB, the Motorola Moto Z2 Play also has 64 GB internal memory. The LG K50 has a bit longer battery life than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 17% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.