Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-08-20 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Moto Z3 has a general score of 77.6, which is slightly better than the LG K50's 72.2 score. Although Moto Z3 is older than LG K50, it's design is just a little lighter and extremely thinner. These devices include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS. The Moto Z3 features a bit faster processor than LG K50, and although they both have 8 cores, the Moto Z3 also has 1 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has a more vivid screen than LG K50, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot greater pixels number per inch of screen and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2160. The Motorola Moto Z3 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than LG K50, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger aperture and a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
The Motorola Moto Z3 counts with a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than LG K50, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB, the Motorola Moto Z3 also has 64 GB internal memory. LG K50 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.