Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action has a score of 78.5, which is a bit better than LG K50's overall score of 72.2. Motorola One Action's body is a little thicker and a little heavier than the LG K50. Motorola One Action counts with a bit better hardware performance than LG K50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola One Action also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One Action has a brighter screen than LG K50, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola One Action also has a way higher display pixels density and a lot higher 1080 x 2520 resolution. Motorola One Action shoots slightly better photographs and videos than LG K50, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video and a much better (4K) video resolution.
The Motorola One Action counts with a much better memory for games and applications than LG K50, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola One Action and LG K50 feature incredibly similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.