Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A41 is much better than the LG K50, getting an 81.7 score against 72.2. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A41 has the older 11 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A41 is a lighter and a bit thinner device than LG K50, even though both of them were released with only a couple of months difference.
The Galaxy A41's processing unit is very similar to the CPU in LG K50, and although the Galaxy A41 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy A41 has a better looking screen than LG K50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a much better screen pixels density and a much higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The LG K50 features a bit bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A41, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A41 and LG K50 have similar batteries performance. The Galaxy A41 features a way better camera than LG K50, because it has a lot bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a camera with way more mega pixels, a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.