Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s has an overall score of 86.6, which is much better than the LG K50's global score of 72.2. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a somewhat thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than the LG K50, even when both of them were released with only a few months difference.
The Galaxy A50s counts with just a bit better hardware performance than LG K50, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy A50s also has 3 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50s has a better looking display than LG K50, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a little bigger screen and a much better number of pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A50s takes greater photographs and videos than LG K50, because it has a camera with a much higher 48 MP resolution, a larger aperture for better low-light captures, a lot better (4K) video resolution and a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality. Samsung Galaxy A50s counts with a greater memory to install applications and games than LG K50, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 1,45 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a little longer battery performance than LG K50, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.