Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is much better than the LG K50, with a 90.8 score against 72.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is a just a little heavier device than the LG K50, but they have the same thickness.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a bit superior CPU than LG K50, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A51 5G features a sharper display than LG K50, because it has a way greater pixel number per screen inch, a quite larger display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A51 5G features a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than LG K50, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A51 5G counts with better battery life than LG K50, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better camera than LG K50, because it has a larger camera aperture, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a camera with much more MP and a lot larger camera sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.