Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the LG K50, with a global score of 91.3 against 72.2. These devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Galaxy A52 5G design is newer and just a bit thinner, but just a little bit heavier than LG K50.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG K50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A52 5G has a much better looking screen than LG K50, because it has a much better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a bit bigger screen and way more pixels per display inch.
Galaxy A52 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG K50, because it has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and video, a lot higher (4K) video definition and a way more mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than LG K50, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports 976 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with better battery duration than LG K50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.