Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a global score of 76.9, which is a little bit better than the LG K50's 72.2 general score. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A70 has the previous 10 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy A70's design is a little bit thinner but a bit heavier than LG K50, and they were only released with a couple months difference.
The Galaxy A70 counts with a brighter screen than LG K50, because it has a little bit larger screen, more pixels per inch in the display and a way higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Galaxy A70 has a better memory for games and applications than LG K50, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A70 features just a little better processing power than LG K50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A70 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy A70 counts with better battery lifetime than LG K50, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. The LG K50 counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor giving a worse image quality and a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and video in low light situations, they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.