Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-20 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 267 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is way better than LG K50's score of 72.2. These phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has an older 10 version while LG K50 has Android 9.0 Pie. Although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is just a little heavier than LG K50, it's a little thinner and also newer.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit superior processor than LG K50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a brighter display than LG K50, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a bit bigger display and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better camera than LG K50, because it has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way higher image quality, a back facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega pixels resolution and a much better (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than LG K50, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory. Galaxy A71 5G UW features better battery performance than LG K50, because it has a 29 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.