Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.2 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-20 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.35 x 3.03 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Aurora black and Moroccan blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than LG K50, getting a score of 97.6 against 72.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy Fold and the LG K50 were only released with a few months difference, the Samsung Galaxy Fold body is heavier but a lot thinner. Both of these devices have the same Android 9.0 Pie OS.
The Galaxy Fold counts with just a little better performance than LG K50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a more vivid display than LG K50, because it has a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display, a larger display and a way higher 1536 x 2152 pixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much better camera than LG K50, because although it has a much worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger diafragm aperture, a bigger sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a much better (4K) video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has much more memory for games and applications than LG K50, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Galaxy Fold features greater battery life than LG K50, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.